<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the Corporate Debtor to set aside the ex-parte order and admission order, citing that the orders were made after due consideration and the application lacked merit. The Tribunal highlighted the availability of alternative remedies under the IBC, 2016 and the restrictions on its power to review its own orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:56:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the Corporate Debtor to set aside the ex-parte order and admission order, citing that the orders were made after due consideration and the application lacked merit. The Tribunal highlighted the availability of alternative remedies under the IBC, 2016 and the restrictions on its power to review its own orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>