https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415519 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, validating their pre-deposit method and entitling them to the refund and interest from the date of sanction. The court held that the appropriation of the refund against the disputed demand was incorrect as the demand was subjudice. The Member (Judicial) set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals and granting appropriate relief, including interest until payment, in alignment with the law and the High Court's directive on the pre-deposit method. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415519 The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, validating their pre-deposit method and entitling them to the refund and interest from the date of sanction. The court held that the appropriation of the refund against the disputed demand was incorrect as the demand was subjudice. The Member (Judicial) set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals and granting appropriate relief, including interest until payment, in alignment with the law and the High Court's directive on the pre-deposit method. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415519