https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415513 The court dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability. The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was rebutted by the respondent through cross-examination, revealing inconsistencies in the evidence presented. The Magistrate's acquittal of the respondent was upheld, emphasizing that the appellant did not meet the stringent criteria required to overturn an acquittal. en-us Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 08:55:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415513 The court dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to prove that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability. The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was rebutted by the respondent through cross-examination, revealing inconsistencies in the evidence presented. The Magistrate's acquittal of the respondent was upheld, emphasizing that the appellant did not meet the stringent criteria required to overturn an acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 27 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415513