https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415512 In a Section 138 cheque dishonour matter, the court examined whether conviction was affected by alleged non-compliance with Section 313 CrPC and claimed non-service of statutory notice. It noted that dishonour for insufficiency of funds, dispatch of notice to the correct address, and the accused's failure to dispute the cheque or signature supported the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also treated the incriminating circumstances as adequately put under Section 313 CrPC and regarded dispatch to the known address, with return showing the addressee was out of station, as sufficient for deemed service. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415512 In a Section 138 cheque dishonour matter, the court examined whether conviction was affected by alleged non-compliance with Section 313 CrPC and claimed non-service of statutory notice. It noted that dishonour for insufficiency of funds, dispatch of notice to the correct address, and the accused's failure to dispute the cheque or signature supported the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court also treated the incriminating circumstances as adequately put under Section 313 CrPC and regarded dispatch to the known address, with return showing the addressee was out of station, as sufficient for deemed service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415512