https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415507 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the evidence presented by the complainant to be substantial, including the dishonored cheque and testimonies from bank officials. The accused's defense was not substantiated with documentary evidence, and he failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act. The court emphasized the limited scope of revisional powers under Section 397 CrPC and dismissed the revision petition, directing the accused to surrender and serve the sentence imposed by the trial court. en-us Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Dec 2021 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415507 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the evidence presented by the complainant to be substantial, including the dishonored cheque and testimonies from bank officials. The accused's defense was not substantiated with documentary evidence, and he failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act. The court emphasized the limited scope of revisional powers under Section 397 CrPC and dismissed the revision petition, directing the accused to surrender and serve the sentence imposed by the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415507