<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1589 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299233</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in imposing liability on the Appellant for failing to cooperate with the Resolution Professional, deeming it unjustified and unsupported. The Tribunal emphasized that the order of liquidation should not be connected to the Appellant&#039;s conduct. While acknowledging concerns of contempt of court, the Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the Appellant during liquidation to be beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction. Consequently, the Appeals were allowed, and the liability for costs on the Appellant was deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1589 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299233</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority erred in imposing liability on the Appellant for failing to cooperate with the Resolution Professional, deeming it unjustified and unsupported. The Tribunal emphasized that the order of liquidation should not be connected to the Appellant&#039;s conduct. While acknowledging concerns of contempt of court, the Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the Appellant during liquidation to be beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction. Consequently, the Appeals were allowed, and the liability for costs on the Appellant was deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>