<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1658 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on the issues of notional interest and the purchase price of power. However, the issue of the contribution towards an unapproved gratuity scheme was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal directed the adoption of Rs. 6.03 per unit as the arm&#039;s length price for electricity generated by the captive power plant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 20:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1658 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on the issues of notional interest and the purchase price of power. However, the issue of the contribution towards an unapproved gratuity scheme was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal directed the adoption of Rs. 6.03 per unit as the arm&#039;s length price for electricity generated by the captive power plant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>