<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1193 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299230</link>
    <description>The authority rejected the applicant&#039;s request for an advance ruling on the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for procurement of scrap and sponge iron for manufacturing M.S. billets. The ruling was deemed inadmissible as the question posed by the applicant was considered technical/procedural and not falling under any clauses of the CGST Act, leading to the rejection of the application under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1193 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299230</link>
      <description>The authority rejected the applicant&#039;s request for an advance ruling on the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for procurement of scrap and sponge iron for manufacturing M.S. billets. The ruling was deemed inadmissible as the question posed by the applicant was considered technical/procedural and not falling under any clauses of the CGST Act, leading to the rejection of the application under the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>