<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27320</link>
    <description>The Wealth-tax Appellate Tribunal was upheld in holding that the penalty order did not violate principles of natural justice as the assessee was provided with sufficient opportunities to rebut the facts. Additionally, the order passed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner imposing the penalty was deemed not time-barred under s. 18(5) of the Wealth Tax Act due to the retrospective application of procedural amendments. The judgment favored the Department, ruling against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 14 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27320</link>
      <description>The Wealth-tax Appellate Tribunal was upheld in holding that the penalty order did not violate principles of natural justice as the assessee was provided with sufficient opportunities to rebut the facts. Additionally, the order passed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner imposing the penalty was deemed not time-barred under s. 18(5) of the Wealth Tax Act due to the retrospective application of procedural amendments. The judgment favored the Department, ruling against the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>