<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299223</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a dispute essentially of civil nature may be quashed in inherent jurisdiction where the real controversy concerns business accounts, possession of premises, and the genuineness of documents already in issue in a pending civil suit. The text notes that earlier attempts to initiate criminal action had failed and the complainant did not contest the matter before SC. On those facts, continuation of the criminal case was treated as unwarranted, and the High Court was said to have erred in refusing quashing, with the proceedings and cognizance order described as an abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299223</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings arising from a dispute essentially of civil nature may be quashed in inherent jurisdiction where the real controversy concerns business accounts, possession of premises, and the genuineness of documents already in issue in a pending civil suit. The text notes that earlier attempts to initiate criminal action had failed and the complainant did not contest the matter before SC. On those facts, continuation of the criminal case was treated as unwarranted, and the High Court was said to have erred in refusing quashing, with the proceedings and cognizance order described as an abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>