<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299222</link>
    <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court may proceed only where the material creates strong suspicion and supports the statutory ingredients of abetment of suicide. The allegations against Ram Kishan and Smt. Rama Devi were limited to assurances and later opinion, without specific acts of cruelty, so the charge under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC was not justified and they were discharged. Smt. Dayawati was also discharged because the material did not credibly show cruelty immediately preceding the suicide. By contrast, the complaints, witness statements and letter disclosed persistent harassment and dowry demands by Naraini Devi, Sukhbir Singh and Daulat Ram, so the charge against them was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299222</link>
      <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court may proceed only where the material creates strong suspicion and supports the statutory ingredients of abetment of suicide. The allegations against Ram Kishan and Smt. Rama Devi were limited to assurances and later opinion, without specific acts of cruelty, so the charge under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC was not justified and they were discharged. Smt. Dayawati was also discharged because the material did not credibly show cruelty immediately preceding the suicide. By contrast, the complaints, witness statements and letter disclosed persistent harassment and dowry demands by Naraini Devi, Sukhbir Singh and Daulat Ram, so the charge against them was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>