https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415505 The court found the petitioner liable to pay SGST & CGST for an intra-state supply despite the supplier charging IGST for an inter-state supply. The respondent was directed to release the seized vehicle upon the petitioner's payment of the applicable SGST and CGST as a deposit. The court ordered the respondent to issue a notice for further proceedings, with the amount paid considered a deposit against any confirmed liability. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed accordingly. en-us Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415505 The court found the petitioner liable to pay SGST & CGST for an intra-state supply despite the supplier charging IGST for an inter-state supply. The respondent was directed to release the seized vehicle upon the petitioner's payment of the applicable SGST and CGST as a deposit. The court ordered the respondent to issue a notice for further proceedings, with the amount paid considered a deposit against any confirmed liability. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415505