<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Customs Broker did not violate Regulation 10(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Therefore, the revocation of the license, forfeiture of the security deposit, and imposition of the penalty were all overturned. The Customs Broker&#039;s appeal was successful, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal and cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Customs Broker did not violate Regulation 10(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2018. Therefore, the revocation of the license, forfeiture of the security deposit, and imposition of the penalty were all overturned. The Customs Broker&#039;s appeal was successful, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal and cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>