https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415470 The Madras HC stated that Section 482 CrPC should be used sparingly and that quashing is justified only when the FIR fails to disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. It noted that a commercial dispute with civil remedies does not bar criminal prosecution where the allegations indicate deception or dishonest intention from the inception. On the facts, the FIR alleged supplies on false assurances, dishonoured cheques, and individual involvement of the accused in promises of repayment. The Court treated the existence of dishonest intention and the effect of not impleading the company as matters for investigation and evidence, and declined threshold interference. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:17:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415470 The Madras HC stated that Section 482 CrPC should be used sparingly and that quashing is justified only when the FIR fails to disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. It noted that a commercial dispute with civil remedies does not bar criminal prosecution where the allegations indicate deception or dishonest intention from the inception. On the facts, the FIR alleged supplies on false assurances, dishonoured cheques, and individual involvement of the accused in promises of repayment. The Court treated the existence of dishonest intention and the effect of not impleading the company as matters for investigation and evidence, and declined threshold interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415470