<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415469</link>
    <description>In NDPS bail matters, seized electronic material, including mobiles, laptops, emails, chats, customer lists, transaction details and forensic data, may support a prima facie finding of large-scale trafficking and external dealings. Although Section 67 statements are not, by themselves, admissible as confessions, disclosure that leads to facts within the petitioners&#039; knowledge remains relevant when read with other incriminating material. The objection that electronic evidence lacked a Section 65B certificate was not accepted where the record showed such certificates were collected. On that basis, the statutory bar against bail operated and release was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 235 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415469</link>
      <description>In NDPS bail matters, seized electronic material, including mobiles, laptops, emails, chats, customer lists, transaction details and forensic data, may support a prima facie finding of large-scale trafficking and external dealings. Although Section 67 statements are not, by themselves, admissible as confessions, disclosure that leads to facts within the petitioners&#039; knowledge remains relevant when read with other incriminating material. The objection that electronic evidence lacked a Section 65B certificate was not accepted where the record showed such certificates were collected. On that basis, the statutory bar against bail operated and release was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>