<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2028 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299210</link>
    <description>The court directed Directors of a company in liquidation to disclose assets by submitting affidavits. Insolvency proceedings against another company were adjourned due to pending liquidation orders. Private respondents agreed to disclose personal assets and were directed to submit affidavits. Company representatives assured the court of sufficient assets to repay depositors. A respondent&#039;s wife made a deposit with the court, pending further directions. The Director of Economic Offences was directed to submit affidavits detailing attached assets, excluding specific companies, for the next hearing. Compliance was required within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 20:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2028 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299210</link>
      <description>The court directed Directors of a company in liquidation to disclose assets by submitting affidavits. Insolvency proceedings against another company were adjourned due to pending liquidation orders. Private respondents agreed to disclose personal assets and were directed to submit affidavits. Company representatives assured the court of sufficient assets to repay depositors. A respondent&#039;s wife made a deposit with the court, pending further directions. The Director of Economic Offences was directed to submit affidavits detailing attached assets, excluding specific companies, for the next hearing. Compliance was required within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>