<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1279 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299212</link>
    <description>A writ court will not ordinarily order specific performance or restoration of possession where the dispute is contractual, material facts are contested, and contractual remedies remain available. The lease had expired by efflux of time, renewal was not automatic, and required consent of the lessor and the State. The claimant also lacked privity of contract with the land owner, so the BOT arrangement could not override the lease terms. A prior non-speaking dismissal of an SLP did not amount to a declaration of law or merger with the High Court order. The proper remedy, if any, lay in a civil suit against the contracting party, not in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 20:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1279 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299212</link>
      <description>A writ court will not ordinarily order specific performance or restoration of possession where the dispute is contractual, material facts are contested, and contractual remedies remain available. The lease had expired by efflux of time, renewal was not automatic, and required consent of the lessor and the State. The claimant also lacked privity of contract with the land owner, so the BOT arrangement could not override the lease terms. A prior non-speaking dismissal of an SLP did not amount to a declaration of law or merger with the High Court order. The proper remedy, if any, lay in a civil suit against the contracting party, not in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>