<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 807 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299198</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the civil appeal failed because the Tribunal had followed its earlier decision in Finolex Cables, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to that precedent had already been dismissed by the Supreme Court. As no fresh legal principle adverse to the assessee was shown to justify departure from that earlier outcome, the Court held that the present appeal could not succeed and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:58:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 807 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299198</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the civil appeal failed because the Tribunal had followed its earlier decision in Finolex Cables, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to that precedent had already been dismissed by the Supreme Court. As no fresh legal principle adverse to the assessee was shown to justify departure from that earlier outcome, the Court held that the present appeal could not succeed and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>