<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 209 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299197</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and writ petitions, ruling that there was no automatic absorption of employees under the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1976. The new proviso under the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976, which was given retrospective effect, validly altered the absorption ratio. The court emphasized that the legislature had the authority to make amendments to meet current requirements and clarified that the saving clause did not preserve any vested rights acquired under the repealed Ordinance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 209 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299197</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and writ petitions, ruling that there was no automatic absorption of employees under the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1976. The new proviso under the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976, which was given retrospective effect, validly altered the absorption ratio. The court emphasized that the legislature had the authority to make amendments to meet current requirements and clarified that the saving clause did not preserve any vested rights acquired under the repealed Ordinance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>