https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299193 A decree allegedly passed on an award could not be treated as a nullity merely because limitation was later disputed, since the objection involved a mixed question of law and fact that should have been raised before the decree became final. An executing court cannot go behind a decree or re-examine its correctness on law or facts; it may disregard only a decree that is void for an inherent lack of jurisdiction apparent on the record. Belated objections raised at the execution stage were therefore impermissible, and the Supreme Court restored the decree-holder's execution and set aside the High Court's remand. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Dec 2021 13:22:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299193 A decree allegedly passed on an award could not be treated as a nullity merely because limitation was later disputed, since the objection involved a mixed question of law and fact that should have been raised before the decree became final. An executing court cannot go behind a decree or re-examine its correctness on law or facts; it may disregard only a decree that is void for an inherent lack of jurisdiction apparent on the record. Belated objections raised at the execution stage were therefore impermissible, and the Supreme Court restored the decree-holder's execution and set aside the High Court's remand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299193