https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299192 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that Section 15 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act did not bar a subsequent eviction petition. It clarified that the principle of res judicata applies between different stages of the same litigation, preventing re-agitation of decided issues. The Court granted the appellants until the end of April 2003 to vacate the premises they had occupied since 1969, with the requirement to provide an undertaking within four weeks. The civil appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the importance of adhering to earlier legal determinations and providing a timeline for compliance with the eviction order. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Dec 2021 14:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299192 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that Section 15 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act did not bar a subsequent eviction petition. It clarified that the principle of res judicata applies between different stages of the same litigation, preventing re-agitation of decided issues. The Court granted the appellants until the end of April 2003 to vacate the premises they had occupied since 1969, with the requirement to provide an undertaking within four weeks. The civil appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing the importance of adhering to earlier legal determinations and providing a timeline for compliance with the eviction order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299192