<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1569 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299190</link>
    <description>The court deemed the bail condition requiring the accused to deposit Rs. 4 crore as a difference of Custom Duty excessively onerous and illegal, as the goods were already seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. The court found the condition violated the Code of Criminal Procedure sections on bail conditions and existing precedents, leading to its invalidation. Consequently, the court allowed the criminal revision, removing the harsh condition and emphasizing that bail terms must adhere to statutory provisions and legal precedents to prevent injustice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1569 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299190</link>
      <description>The court deemed the bail condition requiring the accused to deposit Rs. 4 crore as a difference of Custom Duty excessively onerous and illegal, as the goods were already seized by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. The court found the condition violated the Code of Criminal Procedure sections on bail conditions and existing precedents, leading to its invalidation. Consequently, the court allowed the criminal revision, removing the harsh condition and emphasizing that bail terms must adhere to statutory provisions and legal precedents to prevent injustice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>