https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299189 Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and it cannot replace a trial by testing the sufficiency or reliability of evidence at the threshold. Where the FIR and accompanying material disclose a prima facie offence, issues of culpability and adequacy of proof must ordinarily be left to investigation and trial. On that basis, the High Court was not justified in quashing the FIR, and the criminal proceedings were permitted to continue. en-us Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Dec 2021 12:37:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299189 Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, and it cannot replace a trial by testing the sufficiency or reliability of evidence at the threshold. Where the FIR and accompanying material disclose a prima facie offence, issues of culpability and adequacy of proof must ordinarily be left to investigation and trial. On that basis, the High Court was not justified in quashing the FIR, and the criminal proceedings were permitted to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299189