<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 521 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299181</link>
    <description>The petitioners were discharged of the offence under Section 308 IPC, and the proceedings related to the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC were quashed due to the lack of Magistrate&#039;s permission for investigating the non-cognizable offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 521 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299181</link>
      <description>The petitioners were discharged of the offence under Section 308 IPC, and the proceedings related to the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC were quashed due to the lack of Magistrate&#039;s permission for investigating the non-cognizable offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>