<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299180</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The case involved an incident at the petitioner&#039;s factory where an employee suffered grievous hurt due to the absence of a safety guard on a power press. The court determined that the offense fell under Section 287 IPC, a non-cognizable offense, requiring permission for investigation under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As proper authorization was not obtained for investigating the non-cognizable offense, the court deemed the continuation of proceedings without permission as an abuse of the legal process, leading to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 372 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299180</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The case involved an incident at the petitioner&#039;s factory where an employee suffered grievous hurt due to the absence of a safety guard on a power press. The court determined that the offense fell under Section 287 IPC, a non-cognizable offense, requiring permission for investigation under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As proper authorization was not obtained for investigating the non-cognizable offense, the court deemed the continuation of proceedings without permission as an abuse of the legal process, leading to the quashing of the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>