<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1253 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299176</link>
    <description>The Court held that the deposition of the petitioner from a different suit was inadmissible in the current execution petition under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Court emphasized that the conditions under Section 33 must be met for such evidence to be admissible, which was not the case here. The civil revision petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:35:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1253 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299176</link>
      <description>The Court held that the deposition of the petitioner from a different suit was inadmissible in the current execution petition under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Court emphasized that the conditions under Section 33 must be met for such evidence to be admissible, which was not the case here. The civil revision petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>