https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299175 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding the transfer of rights under the contract and the service of notice under Section 80 CPC. The suit was deemed within the limitation period due to the continuous cause of action. However, specific performance was denied as the auction conditions were not met, and the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to compensation. The court awarded a refund of Rs. 1,56,700 to the plaintiff without interest, except in case of delayed payment, against Union of India, defendant No. 1. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299175 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff regarding the transfer of rights under the contract and the service of notice under Section 80 CPC. The suit was deemed within the limitation period due to the continuous cause of action. However, specific performance was denied as the auction conditions were not met, and the plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to compensation. The court awarded a refund of Rs. 1,56,700 to the plaintiff without interest, except in case of delayed payment, against Union of India, defendant No. 1. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299175