<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299172</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ordering the release of the Appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of legally admissible evidence in criminal cases and cautioned against convicting based on suspicion rather than proof, ensuring adherence to the principles of criminal jurisprudence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299172</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ordering the release of the Appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of legally admissible evidence in criminal cases and cautioned against convicting based on suspicion rather than proof, ensuring adherence to the principles of criminal jurisprudence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>