<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 529 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299169</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the reopening of the case under section 148 was deemed valid. The disallowance of depreciation was upheld, the charging of interest under section 234B was confirmed as mandatory, and the issue of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was not addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 11:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 529 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299169</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the reopening of the case under section 148 was deemed valid. The disallowance of depreciation was upheld, the charging of interest under section 234B was confirmed as mandatory, and the issue of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was not addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>