https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415454 An advance ruling application was rejected because the applicant withdrew the request and the prescribed fee was not paid under both GST enactments. The record showed payment only under the Karnataka GST law, whereas the application had to be supported by the fee under both the State and Central GST laws. As the statutory conditions for entertaining the application were not satisfied, the Authority declined to proceed with the advance ruling request. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415454 An advance ruling application was rejected because the applicant withdrew the request and the prescribed fee was not paid under both GST enactments. The record showed payment only under the Karnataka GST law, whereas the application had to be supported by the fee under both the State and Central GST laws. As the statutory conditions for entertaining the application were not satisfied, the Authority declined to proceed with the advance ruling request. Case-Laws GST Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415454