https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452 An advance ruling application on the taxability of tamarind seeds was rejected because the applicant sought withdrawal and had not paid the corresponding fee under the CGST Act, having paid only under the KGST Act. The Authority treated fee payment under both regimes as necessary for maintainability and held that, in the absence of the CGST fee and with withdrawal requested, the application could not be processed and was liable to rejection under the provision governing rejection of advance ruling applications. en-us Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452 An advance ruling application on the taxability of tamarind seeds was rejected because the applicant sought withdrawal and had not paid the corresponding fee under the CGST Act, having paid only under the KGST Act. The Authority treated fee payment under both regimes as necessary for maintainability and held that, in the absence of the CGST fee and with withdrawal requested, the application could not be processed and was liable to rejection under the provision governing rejection of advance ruling applications. Case-Laws GST Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452