<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 218 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452</link>
    <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings rejected the trader&#039;s application for Advance Ruling on the taxability of Tamarind seeds under the CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017 due to non-compliance with fee payment requirements under both Acts. The applicant only paid the fee under the KGST Act, leading to the rejection of the application. The ruling emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural obligations, including fee payments, for the consideration of Advance Ruling applications under the GST Acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=663010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 218 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452</link>
      <description>The Authority for Advance Rulings rejected the trader&#039;s application for Advance Ruling on the taxability of Tamarind seeds under the CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017 due to non-compliance with fee payment requirements under both Acts. The applicant only paid the fee under the KGST Act, leading to the rejection of the application. The ruling emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural obligations, including fee payments, for the consideration of Advance Ruling applications under the GST Acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>