<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27301</link>
    <description>A business undertaking transferred as a going concern falls within the wide definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because it comprises property, rights, liabilities and organisational incidents of ownership; capital gains can therefore arise on its transfer. Where the undertaking is acquired for a lump sum, however, the consideration cannot be reliably dissected into separate prices for individual assets, exempt assets or goodwill on a speculative basis. The compensation must be treated as consideration for the undertaking as a whole, and no item-wise apportionment is justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 48 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27301</link>
      <description>A business undertaking transferred as a going concern falls within the wide definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because it comprises property, rights, liabilities and organisational incidents of ownership; capital gains can therefore arise on its transfer. Where the undertaking is acquired for a lump sum, however, the consideration cannot be reliably dissected into separate prices for individual assets, exempt assets or goodwill on a speculative basis. The compensation must be treated as consideration for the undertaking as a whole, and no item-wise apportionment is justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>