<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 176 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit on GTA service for outward transportation beyond the factory gate. The case was remanded for a fresh decision by the adjudicating authority, granting the appellant a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and submissions. A time limit of 3 months was set for the reconsideration due to the case&#039;s age, ultimately allowing the appeal by remanding it to the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 176 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit on GTA service for outward transportation beyond the factory gate. The case was remanded for a fresh decision by the adjudicating authority, granting the appellant a fair opportunity for a personal hearing and submissions. A time limit of 3 months was set for the reconsideration due to the case&#039;s age, ultimately allowing the appeal by remanding it to the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>