<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 174 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415408</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the reference petition as not maintainable. The court reaffirmed the finality of the Housing Commissioner&#039;s award and applied the principle of issue estoppel to bar the contractor from re-litigating the same claims. The decision emphasized the binding nature of consent orders and the necessity of challenging awards through appropriate legal channels to prevent their binding effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2021 09:34:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 174 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415408</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Tribunal&#039;s order dismissing the reference petition as not maintainable. The court reaffirmed the finality of the Housing Commissioner&#039;s award and applied the principle of issue estoppel to bar the contractor from re-litigating the same claims. The decision emphasized the binding nature of consent orders and the necessity of challenging awards through appropriate legal channels to prevent their binding effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>