<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299152</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the FIR registered in Crime No. 57/2010 and the related charge-sheet. It held that a second FIR for the same transaction was impermissible. The court found no legal evidence supporting the charges against the petitioner and deemed the continuation of proceedings an abuse of court process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1422 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299152</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashing the FIR registered in Crime No. 57/2010 and the related charge-sheet. It held that a second FIR for the same transaction was impermissible. The court found no legal evidence supporting the charges against the petitioner and deemed the continuation of proceedings an abuse of court process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>