<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 1059 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299150</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner, finding that the allegations did not disclose any cognizable offence. It was determined that the petitioner acted in accordance with official duties and policy decisions, implementing directives without independent criminal conduct. The court stressed the limited use of the power to quash, emphasizing its application when allegations lack credibility or fail to reveal an offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 1059 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299150</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner, finding that the allegations did not disclose any cognizable offence. It was determined that the petitioner acted in accordance with official duties and policy decisions, implementing directives without independent criminal conduct. The court stressed the limited use of the power to quash, emphasizing its application when allegations lack credibility or fail to reveal an offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>