<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1388 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The property was ordered to be released and restored to the appellant. The appellant&#039;s husband&#039;s acquittal in criminal cases related to proceeds of crime led to the negation of the basis for the attachment. The Tribunal held that without the scheduled offence, the attachment could not be justified, referencing the relevant provision of the PMLA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1388 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The property was ordered to be released and restored to the appellant. The appellant&#039;s husband&#039;s acquittal in criminal cases related to proceeds of crime led to the negation of the basis for the attachment. The Tribunal held that without the scheduled offence, the attachment could not be justified, referencing the relevant provision of the PMLA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>