<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 1051 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299159</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the High Court and the Tribunal. The Tribunal was directed to follow the earlier decision of the Calcutta High Court in the appellants&#039; case, which quashed the vesting proceedings due to the non-applicability of Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act to the transferred territories. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of judicial precedents and the principle of per incuriam in ensuring consistency and correctness in legal decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 1051 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299159</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the High Court and the Tribunal. The Tribunal was directed to follow the earlier decision of the Calcutta High Court in the appellants&#039; case, which quashed the vesting proceedings due to the non-applicability of Chapter IIB of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act to the transferred territories. The judgment reaffirmed the importance of judicial precedents and the principle of per incuriam in ensuring consistency and correctness in legal decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>