<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2027 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299157</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition, citing the availability of a statutory remedy for appeal under Section 35 of the Finance Act, 1994 within two months. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction should only be invoked in exceptional circumstances, referencing a recent Supreme Court decision. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2027 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299157</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition, citing the availability of a statutory remedy for appeal under Section 35 of the Finance Act, 1994 within two months. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction should only be invoked in exceptional circumstances, referencing a recent Supreme Court decision. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>