https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155 Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 was held inapplicable to acquisitions under the National Highways Act, 1956 because Section 105(3), as amended, extends only compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement, and infrastructure amenities provisions, not Section 24. The compensation claim under the First Schedule of the 2013 Act also failed because the final awards under Section 3G had been passed before 31.12.2014, the full amount had been deposited with the Competent Authority, and the landholders had received the awarded compensation. In the absence of reliable material showing non-payment to the majority of landholders before the cut-off date, the acquisition was treated as concluded and not reopenable. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155 Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 was held inapplicable to acquisitions under the National Highways Act, 1956 because Section 105(3), as amended, extends only compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement, and infrastructure amenities provisions, not Section 24. The compensation claim under the First Schedule of the 2013 Act also failed because the final awards under Section 3G had been passed before 31.12.2014, the full amount had been deposited with the Competent Authority, and the landholders had received the awarded compensation. In the absence of reliable material showing non-payment to the majority of landholders before the cut-off date, the acquisition was treated as concluded and not reopenable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155