https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155 The court ruled that Section 24 of the Acquisition Act of 2013 does not apply to land acquisition proceedings under the NH Act of 1956. It determined that compensation for land acquisition cases under the NH Act of 1956 should be based on the First Schedule of the Acquisition Act of 2013. The court found that if compensation had been paid before December 31, 2014, the acquisition process was considered settled and not subject to reopening. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling in favor of the respondents. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155 The court ruled that Section 24 of the Acquisition Act of 2013 does not apply to land acquisition proceedings under the NH Act of 1956. It determined that compensation for land acquisition cases under the NH Act of 1956 should be based on the First Schedule of the Acquisition Act of 2013. The court found that if compensation had been paid before December 31, 2014, the acquisition process was considered settled and not subject to reopening. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling in favor of the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299155