https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299163 The Tribunal corrected the record to reflect that Yes Bank had physical possession of the assets of the Corporate Debtor, contrary to earlier submissions. However, a dispute arose regarding the legal possession of the assets, with Yes Bank asserting physical possession but legal ownership being contested by the respondent. The discrepancy between physical and legal possession necessitates further examination to determine rightful possession and resolve potential implications for the ongoing proceedings. The matter was listed for further proceedings to address the issue of legal possession of the assets on 15.11.2021. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:39:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299163 The Tribunal corrected the record to reflect that Yes Bank had physical possession of the assets of the Corporate Debtor, contrary to earlier submissions. However, a dispute arose regarding the legal possession of the assets, with Yes Bank asserting physical possession but legal ownership being contested by the respondent. The discrepancy between physical and legal possession necessitates further examination to determine rightful possession and resolve potential implications for the ongoing proceedings. The matter was listed for further proceedings to address the issue of legal possession of the assets on 15.11.2021. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299163