https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299135 Interim protection against recovery of electricity arrears was held unsustainable when it operated unconditionally while a challenge to Clause 21-A remained pending. The Court relied on its earlier interpretation of the clause and, noting that part of the arrears had already been deposited, held that continued supply could be protected only on a further deposit schedule and timely payment of current charges. It directed that default would automatically vacate the stay and permit disconnection of supply. The merits of the writ challenge were not decided. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299135 Interim protection against recovery of electricity arrears was held unsustainable when it operated unconditionally while a challenge to Clause 21-A remained pending. The Court relied on its earlier interpretation of the clause and, noting that part of the arrears had already been deposited, held that continued supply could be protected only on a further deposit schedule and timely payment of current charges. It directed that default would automatically vacate the stay and permit disconnection of supply. The merits of the writ challenge were not decided. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299135