<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 715 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299132</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the husband&#039;s petition, criticizing the Family Court for improper procedures in rejecting his application for framing additional issues and dismissing the petition in default. The High Court quashed the Family Court&#039;s orders, directing both parties to cooperate for the expeditious disposal of the case and appear before the Family Court for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 12:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 715 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299132</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the husband&#039;s petition, criticizing the Family Court for improper procedures in rejecting his application for framing additional issues and dismissing the petition in default. The High Court quashed the Family Court&#039;s orders, directing both parties to cooperate for the expeditious disposal of the case and appear before the Family Court for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>