<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415403</link>
    <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s request for an interim order to stay further proceedings challenging the notices issued under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court emphasized the availability of remedies within the statute and the potential disruption to the statutory scheme if courts routinely interfered with such proceedings. The court found the officer&#039;s satisfaction with the intention to evade tax based on various factors, including discrepancies in loading goods and the driver&#039;s statement. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the concerned officer for a hearing and scheduled the next hearing date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415403</link>
      <description>The court denied the petitioner&#039;s request for an interim order to stay further proceedings challenging the notices issued under Section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court emphasized the availability of remedies within the statute and the potential disruption to the statutory scheme if courts routinely interfered with such proceedings. The court found the officer&#039;s satisfaction with the intention to evade tax based on various factors, including discrepancies in loading goods and the driver&#039;s statement. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the concerned officer for a hearing and scheduled the next hearing date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>