<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 163 - AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, JHARKHAND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415397</link>
    <description>The ruling authority determined that the installment payments made by a company for the lease of industrial land/shed to RIADA did not qualify as upfront payments and, therefore, were not exempted from GST under serial No. 41 of notification 12/2017. The authority held that the payments made in installments over 5 years after allotment did not meet the criteria of an upfront payment as defined by the notification, leading to the conclusion that the exemption under the notification did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 163 - AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, JHARKHAND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415397</link>
      <description>The ruling authority determined that the installment payments made by a company for the lease of industrial land/shed to RIADA did not qualify as upfront payments and, therefore, were not exempted from GST under serial No. 41 of notification 12/2017. The authority held that the payments made in installments over 5 years after allotment did not meet the criteria of an upfront payment as defined by the notification, leading to the conclusion that the exemption under the notification did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>