<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by deleting specific paragraphs, upheld the remand order, and directed the adjudicating authority to verify the refund claims in accordance with the law and documents submitted. The appeals were disposed of with these modifications, maintaining the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 152 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by deleting specific paragraphs, upheld the remand order, and directed the adjudicating authority to verify the refund claims in accordance with the law and documents submitted. The appeals were disposed of with these modifications, maintaining the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>