<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Restores Case for Further Review on Typographical Error in TNVAT Act Section 84 Assessment of Inter-State Sales.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60765</link>
    <description>Revision of assessment under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 - mistake in the return by itself - inter-state sales - petitioner has made a typographical mistake by adding the VAT turnover for the respective months - nothing precluded the Officer from exercising the jurisdiction under Section 22(6a) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 to see whether any tax remained unpaid - Matter restored back - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:44:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:44:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Restores Case for Further Review on Typographical Error in TNVAT Act Section 84 Assessment of Inter-State Sales.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60765</link>
      <description>Revision of assessment under Section 84 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 - mistake in the return by itself - inter-state sales - petitioner has made a typographical mistake by adding the VAT turnover for the respective months - nothing precluded the Officer from exercising the jurisdiction under Section 22(6a) of the TNVAT Act, 2006 to see whether any tax remained unpaid - Matter restored back - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:44:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=60765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>