<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27286</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to exemption under clauses (f) and (j) of Rule 6DD regarding cash payments for the purchase of goods. The court found that the payments were genuine, the payee&#039;s identity was established, and there was no fraudulent intent. As a result, the court concluded that the assessee met the conditions for exemption under the mentioned rule clauses, and therefore, the court ruled against the Revenue in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27286</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to exemption under clauses (f) and (j) of Rule 6DD regarding cash payments for the purchase of goods. The court found that the payments were genuine, the payee&#039;s identity was established, and there was no fraudulent intent. As a result, the court concluded that the assessee met the conditions for exemption under the mentioned rule clauses, and therefore, the court ruled against the Revenue in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>