<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the added depreciation amounts from contract income and Tripper income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not claimed depreciation under sections 44AD and 44AE as assumed by the authorities, leading to the incorrect additions by the Assessing Officer and Ld. CIT(A). The order was pronounced on 12th October 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 08:43:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the added depreciation amounts from contract income and Tripper income. The Tribunal found that the assessee had not claimed depreciation under sections 44AD and 44AE as assumed by the authorities, leading to the incorrect additions by the Assessing Officer and Ld. CIT(A). The order was pronounced on 12th October 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>