<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings and deleting the addition under Section 69C. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the lack of valid jurisdiction under Section 147 and the absence of concrete evidence proving the purchases as bogus. The Tribunal followed precedents set in similar cases, reinforcing the principle that tax should be levied on real income and not on unverified suspicions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings and deleting the addition under Section 69C. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the lack of valid jurisdiction under Section 147 and the absence of concrete evidence proving the purchases as bogus. The Tribunal followed precedents set in similar cases, reinforcing the principle that tax should be levied on real income and not on unverified suspicions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>